Intraoral Scanners- New Era in Impression Making: A Review Article
Published: 2023-10-14
Page: 318-327
Issue: 2023 - Volume 6 [Issue 1]
Pravinkumar Marure
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, MIDSR Dental College, Latur, Maharashtra, India.
Payal Bhutada *
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, MIDSR Dental College, Latur, Maharashtra, India.
Suresh Kangane
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, MIDSR Dental College, Latur, Maharashtra, India.
Yatishkumar Joshi
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, MIDSR Dental College, Latur, Maharashtra, India.
Trupti Nakhate
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, MIDSR Dental College, Latur, Maharashtra, India.
Swathilekshmi Nair
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, MIDSR Dental College, Latur, Maharashtra, India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
There has been a long-term shift in the healthcare industry towards digitising patient data collecting and information. The same is true of orthodontics. A shift with a "DIGITAL" patient for diagnosis, planning of treatment, evaluation of treatment progress, and for final outcome, virtual technology is becoming more and more popular and readily available for replacing hard-copy data with electronic records. The constraints of traditional plaster models for planning of treatment, fabrication of appliance, and simulated treatment results can be replaced with three-dimensional digital models of dental arches. Indirect bonding trays, aligners, other dental products are all made using intraoral scanners. The main benefit of carring an intraoral scanner is that it reduces or completely eliminate the need to send poured models or imprints to the lab.
Keywords: Intraoral scanners, digitalization, digital models, electronic records, aligners
How to Cite
Downloads
References
Mörmann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2006;137(Suppl):7S–13S.
Martin CB, Chalmers EV, McIntyre GT, Cochrane H, Mossey PA. Orthodontic scanners: What's available?. Journal of orthodontics. 2015;42(2):136–143.
Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, Viguie G, Viennot S, Robinson P, Farges JC, Fages M, Ducret M. Intraoral scanner technologies: A review to make a successful impression. Journal of healthcare engineering. 2017;8427595.
Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: Evaluation of patients perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC oral health. 2014;14:10.
Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: A review of the current literature. BMC oral health. 2017;17(1):149.
Cicciù M, Fiorillo L, DAmico C, Gambino D, Amantia EM, Laino L, et al. 3D digital impression systems compared with traditional techniques in dentistry: A recent data systematic review. Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 2020;13(8).
Rakosi T, Jonas I, Graber TM. Orthodontic Diagnosis. Thieme Medical Publishers, New York, NY; 1993.
Hajeer MY, Millett DT, Ayoub AF, Siebert JP. Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: Part I. Journal of orthodontics. 2004;31(1):62–70.
Redmond WR. Digital models: A new diagnostic tool. Journal of clinical orthodontics: JCO. 2001;35(6):386–387.
Lee KM. Comparison of two intraoral scanners based on three-dimensional surface analysis. Progress in orthodontics. 2018;19(1):6.
Takeuchi Y, Koizumi H, Furuchi M, Sato Y, Ohkubo C, Matsumura H. Use of digital impression systems with intraoral scanners for fabricating restorations and fixed dental prostheses. Journal of oral science. 2018;60(1):1–7.
Mangano A, Beretta M, Luongo G, Mangano C, Mangano F. Conventional Vs digital impressions: Acceptability, treatment comfort and stress among young orthodontic patients. The open dentistry journal. 2018;12:118–124.
Roberta T, Federico M, Federica B, Antonietta CM, Sergio B, Ugo C. Study of the potential cytotoxicity of dental impression materials. Toxicology In vitro : An international journal published in association with BIBRA. 2003;17(5-6):657–662.
Saccomanno S, Saran S, Vanella V, Mastrapasqua RF, Raffaelli L, Levrini L. The potential of digital impression in orthodontics. Dentistry journal. 2022;10(8):147.
Logozzo Silvia, Franceschini Giordano, Kilpela Ari, Caponi M, Governi Lapo, Blois Luciano. A comparative analysis of intraoral 3d digital scanners for restorative dentistry. The Internet Journal of Medical Technology. 2011;5:1-18.
Gupta C, Mittal A. Role of digital technology in prosthodontics: A step toward improving dental care. Indian Journal of Oral Health and Research. 2018;4(2):35.
Palomo JM. Overview: Intraoral digital scanners. Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO, 2017;51(9):622–624.
Kim J, Park JM, Kim M, Heo SJ, Shin IH, Kim M. Comparison of experience curves between two 3-dimensional intraoral scanners. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2016;116(2):221–230.
Joda T, Brägger U. Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: A randomized crossover trial. Clinical oral implants research. 2016;27(12):e185–e189.
Logozzo Silvia, Zanetti Elisabetta, Franceschini Giordano, Kilpela Ari, Mäkynen Anssi. Recent advances in dental optics – Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2014;54:203–221.
Mao Z, Park K, Lee K, Li X. Robust surface reconstruction of teeth from raw pointsets. International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering. 2014;30(3):382–396.
Peluso MJ, Josell SD, Levine SW, Lorei BJ. Digital models: An introduction. Semin Orthod. 2004;10:226–238.
Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mörmann WH, Reich S. Intraoral scanning systems - A current overview. International journal of computerized dentistry. 2015;18(2):101–129.
Dutton E, Ludlow M, Mennito A, Kelly A, Evans Z, Culp A, et al. The effect different substrates have on the trueness and precision of eight different intraoral scanners. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2020;32(2):204–218.
Babayoff N, Glaser-Inbari I. Imaging a three-dimensional structure by confocal focussing an array of light beams. US States Patent, International Patent; 2004.
Camardella LT, Rothier EK, Vilella OV, Ongkosuwito EM, Breuning KH. Virtual setup: Application in orthodontic practice. J. Orofac. Orthop. 2016;77:409–419.
Kravitz ND, Groth C, Jones PE, Graham JW, Redmond WR. Intraoral digital scanners. Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO. 2014;48(6):337–347.
Luqmani S, Jones A, Andiappan M, Cobourne MT. A comparison of conventional vs automated digital peer assessment rating scoring using the carestream 3600 scanner and CS Model+ software system: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2020:157(2):148–155.
Cameron-Williams J. Dental Wings will unveil its intra-oral scanner at IDS 2015[online]; 2014.
Sfondrini MF, Gandini P, Malfatto M, Di Corato F, Trovati F, Scribante A. Computerized casts for orthodontic purpose using powder-free intraoral scanners: Accuracy, execution time, and patient feedback. BioMed Research International. 2018;4103232.
Bloss R. Accordion fringe interferometry: A revolutionary new digital shape-scanning technology. Sens Rev. 2008;28: 22–26.
Lee KM. Comparison of two intraoral scanners based on three-dimensional surface analysis. Progress in orthodontics. 2018;19(1):6.
Hecht E. Polarization. In: Hecht E, editor. Optics. 4. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited. 2008;327–386.
Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J, Schurch Z, Mennito A, Kessler R, Lauer A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3- dimensional comparisons. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2017; 118(1):36–42.
Logozzo S, Franceschini G, Kilpelä A, Caponi M, Governi L, Blois LA. A comparative analysis of intraoral 3d digital scanners for restorative dentistry. Journal of Medical Technology. 2008;5:1-22.