In vivo Comparison of Surface Changes between Two Nickel Titanium Rotary Single File Systems after Instrumentation in Moderately Curved Root Canals
Asian Journal of Dental Sciences,
Page 29-42
Abstract
Aim: To compare post instrumentation surface changes between Two Nickel-Titanium Single Rotary systems (FKG XP Endo Shaper, FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland and Micromega One Curve, Micro Mega, Besancon, France using Stereomicroscope.
Materials and Methods: 40 patients requiring endodontic treatment and satisfying the inclusion criteria for the study were included and randomly divided into 4 groups having 10 patients each. Group 1: Instrumentation of root canal in 10 patients was done using FKG Endo Shaper for 15 seconds. Group 2: Instrumentation of root canal in 10 patients using FKG Endo Shaper for 30 seconds Group 3: Instrumentation of root canal in 10 patients using Micromega One Curve for 15 seconds .Group 4: Instrumentation of root canal in 10 patients using Micromega One Curve for 30seconds. After instrumentation for specified time all the files were examined at the apical and middle third under the Stereomicroscope (Labomed, Inc, United States) at 40X magnification for the presence of any surface changes( defects/ deformity). Scoring of defects was assigned to each file according to the degree of damage. Results were statistically analysed using Kruskal Wallis test and Mann Whitney Post hoc test and were used to compare the median microscopic scores between different groups at Apical and Middle 3rd region. The level of significance was set at P<0.05.
Results: Comparison of microscopic scoring between both the file groups at apical and middle third region using Kruskal Wallis Test revealed that a statistically significant difference was observed in the apical region with p value <o.o2, No statistical significant difference was found in the middle third region, suggesting that the apical region showed more surface changes than the middle third region. Comparison of scores between groups at the apical region using Mann Whitney Post hoc test revealed that there was statistically significant difference in Group 1 compared with group 2, group 3 and group 4 whereas, there was no statistical significant difference between other groups. Comparison of microscopic scoring between Apical and Middle region in each group using Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test revealed that a statistically significant difference was found in the middle third region of Group 4 with P value P<0.03.
Conclusion: It was concluded that More surface changes were seen in FKG XP Endo Shaper file than Micromega One curve. Apical regions showed more changes compared to the middle third region and there was statistically significant difference between groups 1 ,2 and 3. None of the instruments fractured during instrumentation.
Keywords:
- Surface changes
- surface defects
- nickel titanium
- instrumentation
- FKG XP endoshaper
- micromega one curve
- stereomicroscope
How to Cite
References
Michael H, Peters PM. Dummer.Mechanical Preparation of Root Canals: Shaping Goals, Techniques and Means Endodontics Topic. 2005;10(1):30-76.
Haapasalo M, Shen Y. Evolution of Nickel-Titanium Instruments: From Past To Future Endodontic Topics. 2013;29(1):3-17.
Thompson SA. Review – An Overview of Nickel-Titanium Alloys Used In Dentistry. Int Endod J. 2000;33:297-310.
Bahia MG, Buono VL. Decrease in the Fatigue Resistance Of Nickel–Titanium Rotary Instruments After Clinical Use In Curved Canals Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100:249–255.
Serene TP, Adams JD, Saxena A. Nickel Titanium Instruments- Applications In Endodontics. St. Louis: Ishiyaku Euro America, Inc; 1995.
Andreasen GF, Morrow RE. Laboratory And Clinical Analyses Of Nitinol Wire Am J Orthod. 1978;73:142–145
Tewari RK, Kapoor B, Kumar A, Mishra SK, Mukhtar-Un-Nisar-Andrabi S. Fracture of Rotary Nickel Titanium Instruments, J Oral Res Rev. 2017;9:37-44
Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An Initial Investigation of the Bending and Torsional Properties of Nitinol Root Canal Files J Endod. 1988;14:346–351.
Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Wevers M, Lambrechts P. Root Mechanical Canal Preparation With NiTi Rotary Instruments: Rationale, Performance And Safety: Status Report for The American Journal of Dentistry Am J. Dent. 2001;14(5):324-33.
Glosson CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE. A Comparison Of Root Canal Preparations Using Ni-Ti Hand, Ni-Ti Engine Driven, And K-Flex Endodontic Instruments J Endodon. 1995;21:146–51
Purayil, Vasudev B, Kishore G. Comparative Evaluation of Surface Defects In Single File Rotary Systems Before and After Instrumentation In Curved Root Canals. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2018;26(3):130-135.
Baumann MA. Nickel-titanium: Options and challenges. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48: 55-67.
Spili P, Parashos P, Messer HH. The Impact of Instrument Fracture on Outcome of Endodontic Treatment J Endod. 2005;12:845–850.
BoonratS,Garry JN, Joseph EA, Palamara, Harold HM. Defects in Rotary Nickel-Titanium Files After Clinical Use J Endod. 2000;26(3),161-5
Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL Jr. Cyclic Fatigue Testing of Nickel Titanium Endodontic Instruments J Endod. 1997; 23:77 85.
Laustren L, Luebke N, Brantley W. Bending properties of nickel titanium rotary endodontic instruments Abstract 29351. J Dent Res, 1996;75:384.
Sotokawa T. A systematic approach to preventing intracanal Breakage of Endodontic Files. 1990;6(2):60–62.
B Kose T, Caliskan MK. Effectiveness of Hero 642 versus Hedstrom files for removing gutta-percha filling in curved root canals: an ex-vivo study. Int Endod J. 2009;42:1050-6.
Beasley RT, Williamson AE, Justman BC. Time required to Remove Gutta Core, Thermafil Pluse, and Thermoplasticized Guttapercha from Moderately Curved Root Canals with ProTaper Files. J Endod. 2013;39:125-8.
Herold KS, Johnson BR, Wenckus CS. A scanning electron microscopy evaluation of microfractures, deformation and separation in Endo Sequence and Profile nickel titanium rotary files using an extracted molar tooth model. J Endod. 2007;33: 712-4
Chianello G, Specian VL, Hardt LCF, Raldi DP, Lage-Marques JL, Habitante SM. Surface finishing of unused rotary endodontic instruments: A SEM study. Braz Dent J. 2008;19:109-1.
Peters OA, Peters CI, Schonenberger K, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: assessment of torque and force in relation to canal anatomy. Int Endod J. 2003;36:93-99.
Martin B, Zelada G, Varela P, Bahillo JG, Magan F, Ahn S, Rodriguez C. Factors influencing the fracture of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. International Endodontic Journal. 2003;36(4):262–266.
A Poly F, Marques LM, Sassone B, Karabucak. The shaping ability of WaveOne Gold, TRUShape and XP-endo Shaper systems in oval-shaped distal canals of mandibular molars: a micro-computed tomographic analysis Int Endod J. 2021;54(12):2300-2306.
Pérez Morales MLN, González Sánchez JA, Olivieri JG, Elmsmari F, Salmon P, Jaramillo DE, Terol FD. Micro-computed Tomographic Assessment and Comparative Study of the Shaping Ability of 6 Nickel-Titanium Files: An In Vitro Study. J Endod. 2021;47(5):812-819.
Amr E Shaymaa. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance Of XP-Endo Shaper Compared With Different Nickel-Titanium Alloy Instruments Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(3): 1433-1437.
Tufenkci P, Orhan K, Celikten B, Bilecenoglu B, Gur G, Sevimay S.(,Aug).Micro-computed tomographic assessment of the shaping ability of the One Curve, One Shape, and ProTaper Next nickel-titanium rotary systems Restor Dent Endod. 2020;45(3):e30.
Adıgüzel M, Öztekin F. Comparison of the resistance to cyclic fatigue of One Curve, One Shape, 2Shape and EdgeFile X3 Files in simulated single and S-shaped (double) curvatures. Int Dent Res. 2020;10(2): 55-59.
Brockhurst P. Fracture of Endodontic Root Canal Instruments. 1997;23(3):13–17.
Zuolo ML, Walton RE.(,jun). Instrument deterioration with usage: nickel – titanium verses stainless steel Quintessence. 1997;28(6):397.
Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL Jr. Cyclic Fatigue Testing Of Nickel Titanium Endodontic Instruments J Endod. 1997;23:77 85
Tripi TR, Tripi V, Rapisarda E. Defects in GT Rotary Instruments After use: An SEM StudyJ Endod. 2001;27(12):782-785.
Shen Y, Coil JM, McLean AG, Hemerling DL, Haapasalo. (Oct). Defects in Nickel-Titanium Instruments After Clinical Use Part 5: Single Use From Endodontic Specialty Practices J Endod. 2009;35(10): 1363-7
Chakka NV,Ratnakar P ,Das S, Bagchi A, Sudhir S,Anumula L. Do NiTi Instruments Show Defects Before Separation? Defects Caused By Torsional Fatigue In Hand And Rotary Nickel-Titanium (NiTi) Instruments Which Lead To Failure During Clinical Use J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012;13(6): n867-72.
Bonetti F.I, Miranda E R, de Toledo L R, del Rio CE. Microscopic Evaluation of Three Endodontic Files Pre- and Postinstrumentation J Endod. 1998;24(7): 461-4.
-
Abstract View: 40 times
PDF Download: 13 times
